28.7.1997
Is it true that the Leppävaara and Helsinki harbour projects are not commercially viable without such massive State subsidies? It has been shown that the Helsinki region is the only one in Finland which compares to European levels of population density and economic activity. Why then cannot these projects attract sufficient funding from other sources? Dare I suggest that perhaps it is because they are not the best solutions to the problems they are supposed to answer - or is it only political ideology stopping the private sector from taking the lead in such projects?
It is a sad situation when the Government is prepared to spend massive amounts of tax payers cash on half-baked ideas in the Helsinki region, when the national railway network is starved of money to maintain (let alone improve) the tracks and services on behalf of the rest of the nation.